RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PLEDGE FINANCING: BASED ON QUESTIONNAIRE, QUALITY FUNCTION CONFIGURATION THEORY AND G1-ENTROPY VALUE METHOD

Authors

  • Xiangxiang Wang Law School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Schotland, EH8 9JU, UK Author
  • Zhiren Xiao Law School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Schotland, EH8 9JU, UK Author
  • Zehua Kong Public Security Institute, Northwest University of Political Science and Law, China Author

Keywords:

Intellectual Property Pledge Financing, Questionnaire Method, Quality Function Configuration Theory Of Product Quality Risk Management, G1-Entropy Value Method, Expert Identity Information Weighting

Abstract

In the post-epidemic era, a large number of small, medium and micro enterprises still continue to suffer from operational crises, and the use of IPR pledge financing is of great significance in solving the financing problems of enterprises and activating the country's innovation dynamics. Currently, the supply of IPR pledge financing in China is much smaller than the demand, and the first and foremost reason for this phenomenon is the difficulty of value assessment. This study aims to explore the problem of avoiding the risk of IPR pledge financing from the source of risk, i.e., from the perspective of enterprises themselves and from the perspective of risk factors. There are three main highlights in this paper: First, this paper makes an interdisciplinary application of the quality function configuration theory of product quality risk management in marketing, and innovatively builds the overall structure of risk assessment of IP pledge financing in this study, which makes our proposed method logical and reasonable. Second, we adopted the G1 entropy value method of the subjective and objective assignment method to conduct the study. Among them, we made improvements to the G1 method, i.e., we introduced the credibility of experts and the weight of experts' identity information to make the evaluation results more objective and reliable. Meanwhile, methodologically, we combined with the objective authorization method to enhance the reliability of the evaluation results. Thirdly, we obtained the weight size based on the quantitative output of the G1 entropy value method and proposed qualitative countermeasures for the quantitative method. The practical significance of this paper is to find a method applicable to risk assessment for IP pledge financing, and to promote future IP management, risk warning and prevention and control. The academic significance is that the study of this issue can then promote the financing of intellectual property rights and the realization and appreciation of intangible assets. While helping to mobilize people's creative initiative and promote the optimal allocation of social resources, it is also conducive to promoting the overall protection of intellectual property rights and sustainable industrial development, promoting a virtuous cycle of the economy, and even promoting foreign trade and the introduction of foreign and foreign investment.

References

Azatbek T A T, Bekenova L B L, Baimukasheva Z B Z, et al. Commercialization of Intellectual Development of Kazakhstan[J]. Bulletin of The National Academy of Sciences of The Republic of Kazakhstan. 2019.

Ubertazzi B, Iravani F. Choice of Court Agreements in Intellectual Property: ILA Guidelines in the EU and Iran[J]. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2020, 51(2): 144-166.

Fyl R, Luk'Yanova G. Economic and Legal Aspects Against Controlling Goods Turnover[J]. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2020, 5(5): 165-169.

Vogel A T, Watchravesringkan K. Retail Trend Imitation: A Controversy Between Firms of Europe and North America[J]. International journal of business. 2019, 24(1): 96-111.

Novosiolova L A, Grin O S. Intellectual Property Digitization: Administrative Barriers[J]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. 2019(32): 164-183.

Song F, Zhao C. Why do Chinese enterprises make imitative innovation?—An empirical explanation based on government subsidies[J]. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022, 13.

Papageorgiadis N, Mcdonald F, Wang C, et al. The characteristics of intellectual property rights regimes: How formal and informal institutions affect outward FDI location[J]. International Business Review. 2020, 29(1): 101620.

Jarchow S, Röhm A. Business builders, contractors, and entrepreneurs — An exploratory study of IP venturing funds[J]. Journal of Small Business Management. 2020, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print): 1-46.

Jiang Y, Ma Z, Wang X. The impact of knowledge management on intellectual property risk prevention: analysis from China’s strategic emerging industries[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2022, 27(1): 197-207.

Lazarenko Y. Open Innovation Practice: Exploring Opportunities and Potential Risks[J]. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2019, 5(2): 90-95.

Caviggioli F, Scellato G, Ughetto E. Lenders’ selection capabilities, patent quality, and the outcome of patent-backed loans[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2020, 29(1): 43-60.

Wang R. Information asymmetry and the inefficiency of informal ip strategies within employment relationships[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021, 162: 120335.

Nikitenko S N S M, Mesyats M M M A, Korobeynikova E K E V. Risks in Intellectual Property Management [J]. NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management. (202112 (10:2)).

Yin X, Ming H, Bao X. A Risk Decision-Making Model Based on Kalman Filter for Intellectual Property Pledge Financing[J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022, 2022: 1-10.

Bercovici A, Bercovici E G, Maftei M. Applying A Risk Management Model In Intellectual Property Management[J]. Calitatea. 2019, 20(S2): 56-60.

Collier Z A, Guin U, Sarkis J, et al. Decision model with quantification of buyer-supplier trust in advanced technology enterprises[J]. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2021, 29(10): 3033-3056.

Kung L, Cheng C K. Evaluation of innovation risk through patent risk factors: an empirical approach[J]. Queen Mary journal of intellectual property. 2019, 9(4): 414-429.

Appio F P, Baglieri D, Cesaroni F, et al. Patent design strategies: Empirical evidence from European patents[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022, 181: 121776.

Zhang Y A, Chen Z E, Wang Y. Which patents to use as loan collaterals? The role of newness of patents' external technology linkage[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2021, 42(10): 1822-1849.

Zhang L, Liu Z. Research on technology prospect risk of high-tech projects based on patent analysis[J]. PLOS ONE. 2020, 15(10): e240050.

Yuan X, Song W. Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies[J]. Information Technology and Management. 2022, 23(2): 65-76.

Wang M, Hwang K P. Using FAHP Methods Evaluation and Screening of Intellectual Property Rights Managers in Taiwan[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research. 2014, 31(06): 1450048.

Liu S, Ma D. Risk evaluation of intellectual property pledge financing based on fuzzy analytical network process[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2020, 38(6): 6785-6793.

Liu X, Yang G. Research on the selection model of technology-based intellectual property evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Cluster Computing. 2023, 26(S1): 35.

Liu J, Hu Y, Wang F. A model for evaluating the influence factors in trademark infringement based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2020, 38(6): 6777-6784.

Zhang Y Z Y, Jin M J M, Li X L X. A Risk Pre-Warning Mechanism of Chinese High-Tech Industries Based on International Intellectual Property Barriers[J]. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PLEDGE FINANCING: BASED ON QUESTIONNAIRE, QUALITY FUNCTION CONFIGURATION THEORY AND G1-ENTROPY VALUE METHOD. (2023). International Journal of Management (IJM), 14(4), 272-297. https://lib-index.com/index.php/IJM/article/view/IJM_14_04_015