DIVERSITY AS A METHOD OF LIVING – PRELIMINARY INTERNATIONAL SURVEY
Keywords:
Diversity, Everyday Living, Multi-cultural, UN Goals, Digital HumanitiesAbstract
This study uses the concept of diversity from Science applying it to Social Studies to understand the diversity of relationships and inputs present in human everyday living. Diversity requires a multi-ethnical, cultural, age, gender, religious background to be developed. This means diversity in relationships need diversity as a concept in all human relations. Diverse living and lifestyle can potentially support the individual through harsh periods meanwhile diminishing prejudice and intolerance. The present study applied the Diversity Survey Questionnaire containing 47 questions (40 questions using a 5-multiple choice scale ranging from always to never, and 7 questions with written answers). A total of 333 individuals participated in the research. The diversity survey was created by Dr. Monica Mastrantonio to measure how diverse and inclusive a person’s life be can possibly be. The results were collected and measured using the Google platform, and automatically using metrics to reach quantitative results. The collected data shows that diversity has crucial importance in everyday living. Nevertheless, data also showed that people lack significant opportunities to engage in multiple life experiences. Participants also agreed on various aspects that can be done to improve diversity as a method of living. It is concluded that this survey brought important aspects in how people engage in a plural and diverse society, and what needs to be done in that direction.
References
Alan, L.I.U. (2020) Toward a Diversity Stack: Digital Humanities and Diversity as Technical Problem. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 135.1 (2020): 130-51. Web.
Baron, Robert A. Byrne, Donn Erwin. (2000) Social Psychology 9th ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Donald, James. (2007) Internationalization, Diversity, and the Humanities Curriculum:
Cosmopolitanism and Multiculturalism Revisited. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007
Haworth, John T.; Hart, Graham. (2007). Well-being: individual, community, and social perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, G. (2015) What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Biodiversity Conservation in the Anthropocene? Environment and Society, 6 (1). pp. 87-108. ISSN 2150-6779
Mastrantonio, Monica. (2021) Diversity Survey Questionnaire. Fully available at https://forms.gle/QibeyV3oe4kFYYZa7 Open Source. Ongoing.
McLuhan, Marshall. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ramirez, Francisco; Bromley, Patricia; Garnett Russell, Susan. (2009) The Valorization of Humanity and Diversity. Multicultural Education Review 1.1 (2009): 29-54. Web. DOI: 10.1080/23770031.2009.11102862
Rescher, Nicholas. (1985) The Strife of Systems: An Essay on the Grounds and Implications of Philosophical Diversity. Pittsburgh, Pa.: U of Pittsburgh, 1985. Print.
Turner, Caroline S. (2015). Mentoring as transformative practice: supporting student and faculty diversity. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Widmer, Eric D. (1966) Family configurations: a structural approach to family diversity. Farnham: Ashgate.
Wilson, Doirean; Baruch, Yehuda; Boulaye, Patti; Hartog, Mary. (2015) Is this your cultural place or mine? A global and personal career life-course journey perspective of diversity. Human resource management international digest, 2015-07-13, Vol.23 (5), p.2-4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Monica Mastrantonio, Raveenthiran Vivekanantharasa, Lidia Martinez (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.